US Open: Alexander Zverev vs. Jacob Fearnley

Foretrace AI research

Understand the odds. Examine the reasoning.

Polymarket shows market prices. Foretrace adds AI probability estimates, opposing evidence and a price-dependent outcome or pass decision for each open market.

View a sample AI report No open markets in this event. Closed markets retain historical data.

24h volumeUnavailable

Total volume$11.7K

LiquidityUnavailable

Event end date · UTCSep 5, 2025

Price history

Market probability

Loading price history…

Polymarket · UTC

Sampled market observations, not AI forecasts. Lines connect available observations. Legend values are current provider quotes; chart points may be older.

Outcomes & resolution rules

1 market

These are market-implied probabilities, not AI forecasts. A displayed quote may differ from the price available for your order.

ClosedMarket odds100%

US Open: Alexander Zverev vs. Jacob Fearnley

Zverev100%Polymarket estimate

Fearnley0%Polymarket estimate

Liquidity: Unavailable
Deadline · UTC: Sep 5, 2025
Zverev bid / ask: 99.9¢ / 100.0¢
Trading fees: Not flagged by provider

Closed market · historical data

This market is closed. Its historical data remains available.

How research works

Resolution rules

This is a polymarket on the tennis match between Alexander Zverev and Jacob Fearnley in the 2025 US Open men’s singles second round, scheduled for August 28, 2025. This market will resolve to “Zverev” if Alexander Zverev advances against Jacob Fearnley. This market will resolve to “Fearnley” if Jacob Fearnley advances against Alexander Zverev. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond September 4, 2025, without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50–50. If the match ends in a walkover (one player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve in favor of the player who officially advances to the next round. The primary resolution source will be official information from the US Open. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.